Dermatophilosis resources

1. Why should dermatologists be aware of dermatophilosis?
In 2025-2026, two clusters of suspected sexually transmitted dermatophilosis were reported among men who have sex with men (MSM) in Barcelona, Spain, and Lyon/Paris, France, representing the first documented human-to-human transmission of Dermatophilus infection. A total of 18 cases were identified, all occurring in urban settings without animal exposure or tropical travel. Most patients reported recent sauna attendance, suggesting close skin-to-skin contact may facilitate transmission. These reports represent a notable shift in the epidemiology of a pathogen previously considered an exclusively zoonotic infection.(1,2)
2. What is dermatophilosis?
Dermatophilosis is an infection caused by Dermatophilus congolensis, a gram-positive, aerobic actinomycete best known in veterinary medicine as the cause of “rain rot” in horses and “lumpy wool” in sheep. Human infection has historically been rare and almost always associated with occupational or recreational exposure to infected animals. Prior to the 2025-2026 European outbreaks, person-to-person transmission had not been described and was limited to isolated case reports and small case series.(1-5)
3. Why should dermatologists care?
The newly described sexually transmitted form of dermatophilosis can closely mimic more common dermatologic and sexually transmitted conditions. Patients often present initially to dermatologists, sexual health clinics, or primary care physicians with folliculitis-like eruptions involving genital and intertriginous sites. Increased recognition may improve diagnosis and reduce onward transmission, particularly as mupirocin resistance has been reported.(6)
The estimated incubation period appears to be approximately 3-14 days, with a median of 6.7 days.(2) Across both European cohorts, HIV infection, concurrent sexually transmitted infections, and prior STI history were common.(1,2)
4. What are the skin findings?
Clinical presentation varied somewhat between the Spanish and French outbreaks; see Table 1.
| Barcelona cluster | Lyon/Paris cluster | |
|---|---|---|
Commonly involved sites |
|
|
Presentation |
Patients developed a pruritic folliculitis-like eruption consisting of papules, vesicles, pustules, crusts, nodules, and scaly lesions |
Patients developed a pruritic folliculitis-like eruption consisting of papules, vesicles, pustules, crusts, nodules, and scaly lesions |
Symptom duration before presentation |
Median symptom duration before presentation was 6 days. (1) |
Not reported |
Notes |
The distribution often corresponded to areas exposed during sexual contact. Pruritus was variable. Concurrent isolation of Staphylococcus aureus or Staphylococcus lugdunensis in several patients may have modified clinical appearance. (2) No hospitalizations or serious complications were reported in either outbreak. (1,2) |
|
5. What else can look like this?
The differential diagnosis includes:
Bacterial folliculitis
Secondary syphilis
Mpox
Herpes simplex virus infection
Molluscum contagiosum
Scabies
Acneiform eruptions
Candidiasis involving intertriginous areas
Dermatophilosis should be considered when folliculitis-like lesions occur in genital or intertriginous sites and routine microbiologic testing is unrevealing.
6. How is dermatophilosis diagnosed?
Diagnosis relies on culture and microscopy. On blood agar, Dermatophilus grows as yellow, rough, adherent beta-hemolytic colonies that typically become visible within 24-48 hours.(1,2)
Gram stain demonstrates characteristic:
Gram-positive coccoid forms
Branching filaments
Transverse septa
“Tram-track” appearance
MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry successfully identified isolates in both outbreaks and may provide rapid confirmation when Dermatophilus is included in the reference database.(4,7,8)
Whole-genome sequencing demonstrated highly related strains within each cluster, supporting direct human-to-human transmission. The Barcelona isolates may represent a previously undescribed Dermatophilus species.(1)
7. How is dermatophilosis treated?(3,5,7,8)
There are currently no formal treatment guidelines for human dermatophilosis. Available isolates demonstrated susceptibility to:
Beta-lactams
Tetracyclines
Macrolides
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole
Most patients experienced rapid improvement following one week of therapy. Reported successful regimens included:
Cefadroxil 500 mg twice daily
Cloxacillin 500 mg every 6 hours
Doxycycline 100 mg twice daily
Amoxicillin 1 g three times daily
Pristinamycin 1 g three times daily
Notably, all Barcelona isolates demonstrated extremely high-level resistance to topical mupirocin, suggesting mupirocin should not be relied upon for treatment. (1) Although spontaneous resolution may occur, antibiotic treatment is advisable to accelerate recovery and may reduce transmission.
8. Take-home points for dermatologists
The first documented sexually transmitted outbreaks of dermatophilosis were reported in Europe during 2025-2026.
Patients typically present with folliculitis-like papules, pustules, crusts, or scaly lesions involving genital and intertriginous sites.
Recent sauna attendance and sexual contact have emerged as potential risk factors.
Dermatophilosis may mimic common bacterial folliculitis, mpox, syphilis, or herpes infection.
Diagnosis is confirmed by culture, microscopy, and MALDI-TOF identification.
Most reported cases respond rapidly to short courses of beta-lactams or doxycycline.
Awareness is important because this infection is likely underrecognized and may represent an emerging sexually transmissible dermatosis.
References
Zaria L. Dermatophilus congolensis infection (dermatophilosis) in animals and man! An update. Comparative Immunology, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. 1993;16(3):179–222.
Towersey L, Martins EdCS, Londero AT, Hay RJ, Soares Filho PJ, Takiya CM, et al. Dermatophilus congolensis human infection. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 1993;29(2):351–4.
Burd EM, Juzych LA, Rudrik JT, Habib F. Pustular dermatitis caused by Dermatophilus congolensis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2007;45(5):1655–8.
Alejo-Cancho I, Bosch J, Vergara A, Mascaro J, Marco F, Vila J. Dermatitis by Dermatophilus congolensis. Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 2015;21(9):e73–e4.
Aubin GG, Guillouzouic A, Chamoux C, Lepelletier D, Barbarot S, Corvec S. Two family members with skin infection due to Dermatophilus congolensis: a case report and literature review. European Journal of Dermatology. 2016;26(6):621–2.
Amor A, Enríquez A, Corcuera MT, Toro C, Herrero D, Baquero M. Is infection by Dermatophilus congolensis underdiagnosed? Journal of clinical microbiology. 2011;49(1):449–51.
Descalzo V, Moreno-Mingorance A, Álvarez-López P, Salmerón P, García-Pérez JN, Pericás-Cladera FP, et al. Suspected Sexual Transmission of Dermatophilosis among Men Who Have Sex with Men, Barcelona, Spain, 2025–2026. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2026;32(6):964.
Degreze M, Durupt F, Ibranosyan M, Maucotel A-L, Lapendry A, Gouillon L, et al. Suspected sexual transmission of dermatophilosis among men who have sex with men, Lyon and Paris, France, 2025–2026. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2026;32(6):959.
Find a Dermatologist
Member directory
AAD Learning Center
2027 AAD Annual Meeting
Need coding help?
2027 Coding Resources
Clinical guidelines
Why use AAD measures?
New insights
Physician wellness
Joining or selling a practice?
Promote the specialty
Advocacy priorities