Congressional committees release Medicare payment reform proposal
Feb. 7, 2014: Medicare physician payments would increase by
0.5 percent each year for five years under a new bipartisan agreement on
Medicare physician payment reform which would repeal the sustainable
growth (SGR) rate formula. The SGR Repeal and Medicare Provider Payment
Modernization Act of 2014 would also replace the previously proposed
valued-based performance program with a similar Merit-Based Incentive
Payment System (MIPS), which includes prospective performance thresholds
and offers flexibility in the imposition of performance requirements.
The proposal also offers a 5 percent added incentive payment for
physicians in alternative payment models (APM), $40 million in technical
assistance to small practices of 15 or fewer professionals for MIPS
transition or APMs, and $15 million annually for quality measure
Other provisions include the following:
- A requirement that any cuts to individual CPT codes of more than
20 percent as determined in future final Medicare physician fee
schedules be phased in over a two-year period to “dampen” the impact of
those cuts. The current system requires all cuts to CPT
codes go into effect immediately at the start of the calendar year. The
bill would replace a 24 percent across-the-board cut in Medicare
payments with small, positive updates of 0.5 percent for the next five
- Establishment of a program that promotes use of appropriate use criteria for advanced diagnostic imaging.
- Provisions similar to the Standards of Care Protection Act, which the AADA supports.
- Physicians who opt out of Medicare to engage in private
contracting with their patients would no longer be required to renew
their opt-out status every two years.
- Expanded list of criteria used to identify potentially misvalued
services to include codes that account for a majority of spending under
the physician fee schedule; with substantial changes in procedure time;
for which there may be a change in the site of service or a significant
difference in payment between sites of service; services that may have
greater efficiencies when performed together; or, with high practice
expenses or high-cost supplies.
- Requires GAO report in 18 months regarding other Part B services
for which use of clinical decision support mechanisms would be
appropriate, such as clinical diagnostic laboratory services.
- The publishing of utilization and payment data on the Physician Compare website.
The proposal includes changes that the AADA supports, but the
legislation does not include provisions to offset the more than $120
billion cost of reform. Read more about the proposal and how much payment reform is projected to cost.
The AADA has been actively engaged in the efforts to reform the
Medicare physician payment system, and will continue to provide updates
as more information becomes available. For more information, email Shawn
Friesen at firstname.lastname@example.org.
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act did not address the
sustainable growth rate (SGR) formula that governs the Medicare
physician payment rate. Although there were efforts to eliminate the SGR
as part of health system reform, there were not enough votes in
Congress to repeal it.
Enacted as part of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997, the formula was
expected to limit increases in Medicare physician payments by linking
them to the gross domestic product. If spending in a given year exceeds
the SGR target for that year, then physician payments are reduced in the
In 2002, the SGR formula produced a 5.4 percent cut in payment rates.
Since then, Congress has stepped in several times to prevent impending
reductions. Because the SGR underestimates the increase in the volume
and complexity of doctors' services, the formula requires cuts in
physician payments that become more severe with each passing year.
For 2013, the SGR called for a 26.5 percent reduction in physician
payment rates, which Congress voted to delay until Dec. 31, 2013.
However, these last-minute halts only increase the size of future SGR
cuts. For example, the Congressional Budget Office estimates that this
one-year freeze at 2012 payment levels will cost $25 billion.
To date, Congress has not changed the
underlying SGR formula, which is considered to be flawed because it
attempts to limit Medicare spending for physicians' services by
restraining payment rates without limiting the growth in the volume and
complexity of services.
Related Dermatology World articles: